Home Products Industries Applications Solutions Support Insights Contact Us
Back to Blog
Apr 27, 2018·9 min read
Seawater-Desalination_-An-Aid-To-Our-Depleting-Natural-Resources-1

Reverse Osmosis Systems May Get Bio-foul Resistant Membranes Soon

Quick Answer: Biofouling — biofilm formation on RO membrane surfaces — is the most difficult membrane fouling type to control, reducing permeate flux by 20-50% and increasing operating costs. Next-generation anti-biofouling membranes using zwitterionic polymer coatings, silver nanoparticles, and graphene oxide incorporation are showing significant reductions in biofilm adhesion in laboratory studies, with commercial applications emerging.

This is probably the only area which gives nightmares to Reverse Osmosis system owners. Membrane fouling is a common term heard all through the life cycle of a reverse osmosis system. Be it household RO or industrial and military level desalination systems, almost every one of them is prone to biofouling. While avoiding membrane fouling can be achieved through strict and timely maintenance procedures, advances in technology that reduce the effort are always welcome. Such technological innovations have probably led to resistant materials that will thereby reduce the stress of cleaning on the consumers.

What is bio-fouling?

Biofouling happens when a membrane surface is covered by microbial colonization. Once these organisms attach themselves permanently to the walls of the membrane, these organisms release extracellular polymeric secretions. Comprised of majorly polysaccharides, lipoproteins and glycoproteins, the secretion adds to the formation of a layer of a biofilm. This can be seen quite easily on the membrane surface of a used RO at your home. This results in lesser permeate flux, decrease in lifespan and in turn, an increase in operational cost. For a long time, scientists and engineers have been struggling with an answer for this and they probably have come up with one.

Current Solution

Today, thin film composites are used as membranes for desalinating water. These are ultra-thin polyamides with microporous substrates. The characteristics that it features are harshly affected by the microbial foul and adhesion. There are a lot of ways through which the foulants absorb the membrane surface and these are through hydrophobic interactions, Lewis acid-base interaction, hydrogen bonding, Vander walls attraction and electrostatic repulsion. This interaction is hence taken into consideration while developing a membrane material that is foul resistant.

Can bio-foul resistant membrane be made available?

A temporary solution for the problem is a modification of the thin film composite in order to decrease its roughness, increase its surface hydrophilicity and change the electrical charge of the membrane so as to make it the same as the bio foulant.

A few possible strategies that can be used to produce such membranes are:

  • Anti Adhesion elements: Like Polyethylene Glycol, Natural Hydrophilic polymer sericin, hyperbranched polymers etc.
  • Antimicrobial elements: Like Antimicrobial polymers, incorporation of antimicrobial elements into the membrane structure etc.

Recently many more strategies have been suggested to make changes in the structure and production of thin membranes. Some of these are a surface coating or grafting of hydrophilic elements. A common approach nowadays for many is to coat the membrane with PEGylated polymers due to its simplicity. A major portion of the experts prefers membrane induced by antimicrobial elements. This is because it increases surface functionalization and reduces wearing out of the surface coating. Another unintended advantage of this inducing is fewer pollutants in the rejected water leading to safe environmental standards.

Another suggestion that comes out the way is the use of biocidal inorganic substances on the membrane. This includes silver and copper nanoparticles, carbon nanotubes and graphene. However, the challenge lies in the nanoparticles losing their functionality over a period of time. Therefore producing a thin film composite membrane is very difficult and tricky.

Needless to say, membrane technology has seen advances in other aspects of efficiency, but with bio-fouling in place, the membrane can never work at its full potential. The aim here has to be of producing bio foul resistant membranes that need no external chemical to clean itself. Be it by surface coating of incorporation of the antimicrobial element, in one way or another making membranes more effective and less maintenance could be a priority of these times.

 

Author’s Bio:
Ampac USA is a leading manufacturer of advanced reverse osmosis water treatment systems. For over 30 years the company has been providing its customers and clients around the world solutions to their water treatment problems. With years of an impressive track record, Ampac strives to develop solutions to make reverse osmosis systems, advanced for improved quality and cost efficiency.

What is the typical lifespan of an RO membrane?

High-quality RO membranes last 2–5 years depending on feed water quality and maintenance frequency. AMPAC USA systems use thin-film composite (TFC) membranes rated for extended service life. Regular pre-filter replacement and periodic membrane cleaning significantly extend operational longevity.

How much water does an RO system waste?

Standard RO systems recover 50–75% of feed water as permeate (purified output), with the remainder discharged as concentrate. AMPAC USA's high-recovery commercial systems achieve up to 85% recovery using energy recovery devices and optimized flow design, reducing operational costs substantially.

What pressure is required for a reverse osmosis system?

Brackish water RO systems typically operate at 150–600 PSI, while seawater systems require 800–1,200 PSI. AMPAC USA designs each system to match source water salinity and desired flow rate, incorporating energy-efficient high-pressure pumps with variable frequency drives (VFDs) to minimize power consumption.

Can reverse osmosis remove viruses and bacteria?

Yes. RO membranes provide absolute removal of bacteria (>99.9999%) and viruses (>99.99%), making them one of the most effective water purification technologies. AMPAC USA systems exceed NSF/ANSI 58 standards and include pre-treatment stages to protect membrane integrity.

Related Articles

Conclusion

This post explored how reverse osmosis technology delivers high-purity water across a wide range of residential, commercial, and industrial applications. For businesses and organizations requiring reliable RO purification, AMPAC USA engineers custom systems tailored to your specific water quality requirements and flow demands. Contact our team at info@ampac1.com or (909) 548-4900 to discuss your water treatment needs.

Anti-Biofouling RO Membrane Technology: State of Research and Development

Biofouling — the attachment, growth, and accumulation of microorganisms on membrane surfaces — is the most operationally challenging and economically costly form of RO membrane fouling. Unlike inorganic scaling (which can be controlled with antiscalants and acid cleaning) or colloidal fouling (controlled with pre-treatment), biofouling involves living organisms that produce extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) creating a protective biofilm matrix that resists conventional cleaning agents and regenerates rapidly after cleaning. Biofouling costs the global water desalination industry an estimated $500 million annually in cleaning chemical costs, increased energy consumption, premature membrane replacement, and production downtime.

Current mitigation strategies include intermittent biocide dosing (DBNPA, isothiazolinone), periodic CIP with alkaline surfactant formulations (sodium hydroxide + SDS), and UV disinfection of feed water. While these approaches manage but do not eliminate biofouling, they also introduce operational complexity, chemical costs, and potential membrane compatibility concerns with certain biocide formulations. The research community has focused on developing membrane surface modifications that prevent initial bacterial adhesion — reasoning that if bacteria cannot colonize the surface, the self-amplifying biofilm formation process cannot begin.

Promising anti-biofouling membrane approaches include: zwitterionic polymer brush coatings that create a hydration layer preventing protein and bacterial adhesion; silver nanoparticle (AgNP) incorporation with broad-spectrum bactericidal activity; graphene oxide surface modification with inherent antibacterial properties; and TiO2 nanocomposite membranes activated by UV light to generate bactericidal reactive oxygen species. Several research groups and membrane manufacturers (DuPont, Toray, LG Chem) have announced commercial anti-biofouling membrane prototypes. AMPAC USA monitors these developments and incorporates proven advances into system designs as they achieve commercial scalability and validated performance.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What is biofouling in RO systems and why is it a problem?

A: Biofouling is the formation of bacterial biofilms on RO membrane surfaces. Biofilm increases hydraulic resistance (reducing permeate flux), increases salt passage, elevates differential pressure across membrane elements, and is difficult to remove without membrane-damaging harsh chemicals. It is the leading cause of unplanned RO system downtime.

Q: How do you detect biofouling in an RO system?

A: Early biofouling indicators include gradual increase in normalized differential pressure (NDP) across membrane elements, decreasing normalized permeate flow at constant pressure, unusual biological odors in permeate, and elevated ATP (adenosine triphosphate) levels in membrane autopsies. Biofilm assays (BART, heterotrophic plate count) on feed and concentrate water provide early warning.

Q: What are the best cleaning agents for RO membrane biofouling?

A: Alkaline cleaning with 0.1% sodium hydroxide + 0.025-0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) at pH 11-12 is the standard protocol for biofouling removal. Some protocols also use EDTA chelation to destabilize biofilm EPS matrix. Enzyme-based cleaning agents specifically targeting EPS components are emerging as alternatives.

Q: What are zwitterionic polymer coatings for RO membranes?

A: Zwitterionic polymers carry both positive and negative charges balanced at net-zero overall charge. When coated on membrane surfaces, they bind water molecules tightly, creating a hydration barrier that physically prevents protein and bacterial adhesion. Laboratory studies show 2-5x reduction in biofilm formation compared to unmodified TFC membranes.

Q: Do silver nanoparticles in RO membranes remain effective long-term?

A: Laboratory studies show significant initial anti-biofouling performance from AgNP-incorporated membranes. However, silver leaching under operating conditions raises concerns about long-term efficacy (silver depletion) and potential toxicity to aquatic ecosystems in concentrate discharge streams. Regulatory acceptance varies by region.

Q: How does biofouling affect the energy consumption of an RO system?

A: Biofilm increases hydraulic resistance, requiring higher operating pressure to maintain the same permeate flow rate. A 30% decline in permeate flux from biofouling typically requires a 15-20% increase in feed pressure, directly increasing energy consumption. Over a typical membrane service life, biofouling-related energy penalties can account for 15-30% of total energy costs.

Scroll to Top