Home Products Industries Applications Solutions Support Insights Contact Us
Back to Blog
Dec 26, 2020·9 min read
Why Are The Residents Of This Nation Afraid To Drink Tap Water?

Why Are The Residents Of This Nation Afraid To Drink Tap Water?

Quick Answer: Many residents distrust or cannot safely drink tap water due to aging infrastructure (lead pipes, corrosion), industrial contamination, agricultural runoff, inadequate treatment capacity, or regulatory enforcement failures. Even in the US, communities in low-income and rural areas, and those with aging lead service lines, face legitimate tap water safety concerns that justify home point-of-use filtration.

Water is an essential need of the human body and is required in huge amounts for the growing population in the world. Health benefits of water aside, without it, the body begins to shut down its functions. Now consider if the water being supplied to you doesn’t taste right, would you have it even if there was a chance for it to risk your health? More than half of the Americans don’t think so.

In a phone interview with Lucy Schouten from the Christian Science Monitor, Peggy Schwartz, aged 56 from Phoenix describes how her daily life involves bottles. “I use, for drinking, all bottled water and have forever,” says Ms. Schwartz. “But I have never had anything tested, I don’t know statistically if it’s good, bad or what.” This sudden change in lifestyle came in Ms. Schwartz’s life when one fine day the tap water did not taste right.

After the Flint water crisis garnered global attention, NSF International, a global public health and safety organization conducted a survey, results of which revealed that, while 71% of Americans drink tap water,

More than half (55%) of Americans are concerned about contaminants in their drinking water.

All cities are required to provide water quality reports to its consumers, but after Boston, very few cities have mapped the presence of lead pipes in their city supply system. Before 1950, lead pipes were in use for the supply of water from treatment plants to homes and businesses. Now the pipes used are mostly copper, but cities do not know which ones have been replaced.

Recently, Andrew Flett quit his job as an assistant operator at the water treatment plant in Garden Hill First Nation, to be a cargo driver. In an exclusive to CBC News, Flett said he was confident about the water when it left the treatment plant, that it was safe and drinkable.  

“It was severe with my daughter and my wife because when they would eat they couldn’t keep anything down. So I started boiling the water from our tap. They seemed fine after that.”

This led to his family and hundreds like him take out the plumbing of water supply. His pipes are not connected to the treatment plant, instead, water is drawn from storage tanks which are refilled by truck deliveries bringing in water from the plant.

“There’s like a film that settles at the bottom of every tank. It’s full of bacteria and you can get sick. It causes diarrhea, eating problems and all that,” adds Flett.

Even water quality, like most public services, seems to differ for different income families. In a poll by AP/GfK suggested Americans are aware of it. In households with more than $100,000 annual income, 6 out of 10 people trusted the tap water. As the level goes down, the poll found out, in a household with less than $50,000, the number decreased to 4 out of 10.

Whether water is tasty or not is difficult to quantify. Although Boston, which has some of the oldest pipes in the country was awarded the 2014 Tastiest Tap Water title by American Water Works Association that conducts the tap water taste test. A lot of such cities use corrosion control treatment chemicals to purify the water passing through the lead pipes. A crucial step like this was neglected by Flint for 3 years. With time, lead mixes with the water and poisons those who drink it.

Even as the country shivered with the horror of poisoned lead water discovered in Flint, even more scary news came out of NBC earlier this month. In a report from Government Accountability Office found 41 percent of the country’s schools hadn’t tested for lead in water and, 37 percent found elevated levels of lead in the school drinking water.

Even with the difference in lead levels in the water, its presence is harmful to people, causing irreversible nerve damage and permanent brain damage in babies and children. Adults can face high blood pressure and other problems due to consumption. Even the Food and Drug Administration does not allow lead more than 5 parts per billion for bottled water.

With so much going on around, there is a high need for the authorities to look into the safety standards of water supply in each city to avoid another Flint crisis from happening. It is only to see then if the citizens are ready to accept water coming in from their taps.

What flow rates are available for emergency water treatment?

AMPAC USA's emergency systems range from 1,500 GPD portable units to 50,000+ GPD trailer-mounted systems. Military-specification units are available for forward operating base deployment, producing potable water meeting EPA and WHO drinking water standards from virtually any source.

Are emergency RO systems suitable for disaster relief operations?

Yes. AMPAC USA's emergency systems are used by FEMA, the U.S. military, and international NGOs for disaster relief. They treat flood water, contaminated groundwater, and brackish sources, removing bacteria, viruses, and chemical contaminants to produce safe drinking water on-site.

What power sources can emergency water purification systems use?

AMPAC USA's emergency systems can run on generator power (120/240V or 480V 3-phase), solar panels with battery backup, or vehicle power take-off (PTO). Low-power models consume as little as 0.5 kW, making them viable for off-grid deployment.

How durable are military-grade water purification systems?

AMPAC USA's military systems are built to MIL-SPEC standards with stainless steel frames, powder-coated components, and UV-resistant materials. They are designed to operate in temperatures from -20°F to 120°F and are vibration-tested for transport in military vehicles.

Related Articles

Conclusion

This post highlighted how emergency and military-grade water purification systems provide safe drinking water rapidly in the most challenging field conditions. For organizations requiring deployable water treatment capability, AMPAC USA engineers portable and trailer-mounted systems built to perform wherever they are needed. Contact our team at info@ampac1.com or (909) 548-4900 to discuss your emergency water treatment requirements.

Tap Water Safety: A Global and US Perspective

Tap water safety varies enormously both between countries and within countries. Globally, the WHO defines “safely managed” drinking water as water from an improved source, accessible on premises, available when needed, and free from fecal and chemical contamination. By this definition, nearly a third of the global population lacks safely managed drinking water — including hundreds of millions who have tap connections but receive intermittent, inadequately treated, or chemically contaminated water. Infrastructure failure, insufficient treatment chemicals, power outages affecting pumping and treatment, and corruption in water utility management all contribute to unsafe delivered water even where treatment capacity theoretically exists.

Within high-income countries, tap water safety is not uniform. In the United States, communities with aging infrastructure, private well dependence, near industrial or agricultural contamination, or financial stress limiting treatment system maintenance face real water quality deficits. The water crisis in Flint, Michigan — where corrosive river water leached lead from aging infrastructure into drinking water for 18 months before public acknowledgment — exposed the intersection of infrastructure age, regulatory failure, environmental injustice, and public health consequences. Jackson, Mississippi faced complete treatment plant failure in 2022. More commonly, hundreds of small communities across the US serve water with elevated lead, nitrates, arsenic, or PFAS above MCLs without significant public attention.

The individual protective response to documented or suspected tap water quality concerns is point-of-use treatment. NSF/ANSI 58-certified reverse osmosis systems provide verified lead, arsenic, nitrate, and PFAS reduction to below EPA MCLs — providing consistent protection regardless of upstream infrastructure condition. For families in communities with known water quality problems, a home RO system is not optional comfort but practical public health protection. AMPAC USA designs residential and community-scale systems specifically for populations with legitimate infrastructure-based tap water concerns.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Which countries have the most unsafe tap water?

A: Countries with the greatest proportion of population lacking safely managed drinking water are concentrated in sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, and parts of Southeast Asia and Latin America. However, even high-income countries including the US, UK, and Australia have pockets of water quality failure in specific communities.

Q: Is tap water in the US always safe to drink?

A: Municipal water in the US is generally regulated and treated, but not uniformly safe. Communities with lead service lines, those receiving water from contaminated groundwater sources, small water systems with limited compliance resources, and private well owners all face potential tap water safety concerns.

Q: What was the Flint, Michigan water crisis?

A: In 2014-2015, Flint switched water sources without adequate corrosion control treatment, causing lead to leach from aging pipes into drinking water at up to 13,000 ppb — 867 times the EPA action level. Children were exposed to neurotoxic lead levels for 18 months before the crisis was officially acknowledged.

Q: How do residents protect themselves from unsafe tap water?

A: NSF-certified point-of-use treatment (carbon block filters for taste/chlorine, RO for heavy metals/PFAS/nitrates, UV for bacteria) provides individual protection independent of municipal system quality. Use only certified products for the specific contaminants of concern.

Q: Is bottled water safer than tap water in the US?

A: Not necessarily. FDA bottled water standards are not stricter than EPA tap water standards, and bottled water is tested less frequently. A significant proportion of bottled water is purified municipal tap water. NSF-certified home filtration provides equal or better purity at far lower cost and without plastic waste.

Q: What is the difference between a boil water advisory and a do not drink advisory?

A: A boil water advisory indicates microbial contamination risk — boiling for 1 minute kills bacteria, viruses, and protozoa. A do not drink advisory indicates chemical contamination that boiling cannot address (and may concentrate). During a do not drink advisory, only commercially bottled water or NSF-certified RO-treated water is safe.

Scroll to Top