Facebook X-twitter Youtube Linkedin
  • 909-548-4900
Ampac USA logo
  • Home
  • Products
  • Industries
  • Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Products
  • Industries
  • Solutions
  • Contact Us
Home Water Filter

Prenatal exposure to PFOS and PFOA in a pregnant women cohort of Catalonia, Spain

Sammy Farag by Sammy Farag
August 1, 2019
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

By:Rovira, J (Rovira, Joaquim)[ 1,2 ] ; Martinez, MA (Angeles Martinez, Maria)[ 1 ] ; Sharma, RP (Prasad Sharma, Raju)[ 1 ] ; Espuis, T (Espuis, Teresa)[ 1 ] ; Nadal, M (Nadal, Marti)[ 2 ] ; Kumar, V (Kumar, Vikas)[ 1,2 ] ; Costopoulou, D (Costopoulou, Danae)[ 3 ] ; Vassiliadou, I (Vassiliadou, Irene)[ 3 ] ; Leondiadis, L (Leondiadis, Leondios)[ 3 ] ; Domingo, JL (Domingo, Jose L.)[ 2 ] …More

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH

Volume: 175

Pages: 384-392

DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.05.040

Published: AUG 2019

Document Type:Article

Abstract

This study was aimed at assessing the prenatal exposure to perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) in a cohort of pregnant women living in Reus (Tarragona County, Catalonia, Spain). These chemicals were biomonitored in maternal plasma during the first trimester of pregnancy, at delivery, and in cord blood. The dietary exposure of PFOS and PFOA was estimated by using questionnaires of food frequency and water intake, as well as data on food levels previously reported in the same area. In addition, the exposure through air inhalation and indoor dust ingestion was also calculated. Finally, a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was applied in order to establish the prenatal exposure of the fetus/child and to adjust exposure assessment vs. biomonitoring results. Probabilistic calculations of fetal exposure were performed by forward internal dosimetry and Monte-Carlo simulation. Mean plasma levels of PFOA were 0.45, 0.13 and 0.12 ng/mL at the first trimester, at delivery and in cord plasma, while those of PFOS were 2.93, 2.21, and 1.17 ng/mL, respectively. Traces of PFOS were found in all samples in the trimester and at delivery, and almost in all cord blood samples. Transplacental transfers of PFOS and PFOA were estimated to be around 70% and 60%, respectively. A temporal decrease trend in plasma levels of PFOS and PFOA was noticed, when comparing current values with data obtained 10 years ago in the same area. In agreement with many other studies, dietary intake was the main route of exposure to PFOS and PFOA in our cohort of pregnant women. It is an important issue to establish the exposure in critical windows periods such as fetal development to perfluoroalkylated substances, but also to other endocrine disrupting chemicals.

http://cel.webofknowledge.com/InboundService.do?customersID=Alerting&smartRedirect=yes&mode=FullRecord&IsProductCode=Yes&product=CEL&Init=Yes&Func=Frame&action=retrieve&SrcApp=Alerting&SrcAuth=Alerting&SID=6Fpc3v47y78KvDR3xKl&UT=WOS%3A000473836300039

The post Prenatal exposure to PFOS and PFOA in a pregnant women cohort of Catalonia, Spain appeared first on Facts About Water.

Source: Water Feed

Tags: RO
Sammy Farag

Sammy Farag

Next Post

Presence of antibiotics in the aquatic environment in Europe and their analytical monitoring: Recent trends and perspectives

Comments 1

  1. binance says:
    2 days ago

    I don’t think the title of your article matches the content lol. Just kidding, mainly because I had some doubts after reading the article.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recommended.

How to Choose the Best Commercial Reverse Osmosis System: A Comprehensive Guide

How to Choose the Best Commercial Reverse Osmosis System: A Comprehensive Guide

August 14, 2018

Differential development of Legionella sub-populations during short- and long-term starvation

August 14, 2018

Subscribe.

Trending.

Which US States Have the Best Water Quality? Get the Answer Here

Which US States Have the Best Water Quality? Get the Answer Here

August 25, 2021
Reverse Osmosis Pool cleaners as a substitute for chlorine

Reverse Osmosis Pool cleaners as a substitute for chlorine

September 19, 2017
Water filter guide in USA

Water filter guide in USA

August 5, 2025
Reverse Osmosis system Troubleshooting: Fix 7 Common Problems

Reverse Osmosis system Troubleshooting: Fix 7 Common Problems

December 30, 2024
Deionized Water Vs. Distilled Water- Everything You Need to Know

Deionized Water Vs. Distilled Water- Everything You Need to Know

January 23, 2023

AMPAC USA 2262 S 1200 W Suite #103 Woods Cross, UT 84087

US Phone: (909) 548-4900

ABOUT US

Welcome to Ampac USA’s sophisticated water purification systems, which are designed to tackle the most challenging water purification, water supply, wastewater treatment, and seawater desalination challenges in the world’s harshest settings.

KNOW MORE ABOUT

  • Home
  • Products
  • Industries
  • Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Products
  • Industries
  • Solutions
  • Contact Us

INFORMATION LINKS

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Delivery Information
  • Sitemap
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Delivery Information
  • Sitemap

CUSTOMER SUPPORT

Get updates on special events and receive your first drink on us!

Facebook X-twitter Youtube Linkedin
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Review
  • Apple
  • Applications
  • Computers
  • Gaming
  • Gear
    • Audio
    • Camera
    • Smartphone
  • Microsoft
  • Photography
  • Security

© 2025 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.