\n\n
By:Damian, L (Damian, Laura)[ ProductCode=Yes&product=CEL&Init=Yes&Func=Frame&action=retrieve&SrcApp=Alerting&SrcAuth=Alerting&SID=7EG1nSDtzgCWj6uzzM2&UT=WOS%3A000473511200014#addressWOS:000473511200014-1″>1 ] ; Patachia, S (Patachia, Silvia)[ 1 ] ; Scarneciu, I (Scarneciu, Ioan)[ 2 ]
\n\n
\n
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL
\n\n
Volume: 18
\n
Issue: 5
\n
Pages: 1089-1095
\n\n
\n
Published: MAY 2019
\n
Document Type:Article
\n\n
\n
\n
This study looked at how the material of quality-concerns/”>storage tanks and different stirring methods affect drinking water quality. We tracked changes in water quality for two weeks, both when it was still and when it was stirred with magnets or sound waves. We checked things daily, like how many germs were growing (total count, lactose-positive, coliform, E. coli), and physical stuff like cloudiness and chlorine levels. It turns out, water quality changed differently depending on how long it sat and how it was treated. Glass tanks didn’t encourage germ growth at all, but polyethylene tanks were a big problem for bacteria. Both mechanical stirring and sonication, which uses sound waves, really helped cut down on biofilm forming on tank walls, no matter what the tank was made from. However, sonication didn’t work well for water in polyethylene tanks. Why? It actually made the water warmer, which just made the free-floating bacteria more active.
\n \n\nThe post DETERIORATION OF WATER QUALITY BY STAGNATION IN STORAGE TANKS appeared first on Facts About Water.\n\nSource: Water Feed
AMPAC USA engineers custom water purification systems for commercial, industrial, and emergency applications — from 500 GPD to multi-million GPD. Trusted by municipalities, military, and industry worldwide.
